So we see two extreme types of interview being opposed | But each of these interview types is more or less appropriate for the purpose of the research |
---|---|
The real test will only happen later in the process | Unless it is a live one, this type of interview can be worked on and restructured, whether it is the print media, the radio or the television;• One, in-depth and possibly non-directive, will be of clinical interest and will be part of any methodology based on the effectiveness of the clinical method, dealing with extreme or in-depth cases, and not with series and averages; it will likewise enter as an element, and sometimes a key element, into action techniques, if only because it solicits the active intervention of the interviewee |
In addition, they can be combined; In-depth interviews prepare the questionnaires that will be used according to the opinion polls method and conversely, questionnaire surveys can be used to select topics for in-depth interviews | The interview Questions-Answers: It presents itself as a dialogue |
---|---|
The other extreme type of interview will be based on a pre-established questionnaire, and will make it possible to work on large masses by sampling on a representative sample | Between the two extreme tendencies of the interview, there is antagonism |
On the other hand, the intensive interview, which aims to deepen the content of the communication.
21